It’s incredibly rare that I will create, comment or otherwise vent on the web but immediately after considering the concept more than I’ve decided to share a few of my thoughts with you about what fitness is, what it is really about and who need to be deemed fit. Of course this is only my opinion at this point in history, but it deserves becoming mentioned nonetheless. I am writing this, admittedly, out of disappointment. I read fit people’s articles, newsletters and blogs continually in order to study and boost myself in this market we get in touch with fitness but lately I’ve come across a quantity of really match men and women drawing lines in the sand (relating to what fitness is), that, in my opinion, never seriously will need to be there.

Now you’ve heard me say it a million times! Fitness (technically) is ordinarily defined in a way that has one thing to do with getting optimal levels of:

cardiovascular endurance,
muscular endurance,
muscular strength,
flexibility,
physique composition (fat vs. lean physique mass)

Although this is true and I undoubtedly agree, I consider what we are speaking about is a quantitative way to look at a qualitative challenge. Yea sports are quantitative. How a great deal, how quite a few, how low, how higher, how sturdy, how far, how major, how lengthy – these are things we associate rather often with sport. In America we have a tendency to be a quantitative society. We want to know how substantially revenue a individual has, who has the most mates, who spends the most on garments, who has the lowest physique fat percentage, who can bench press the most weight and who can run the longest distance in the least amount of time. We are obsessed with numbers, quantities and maintaining score.

So I raise the question: Is physical fitness truly a quantitative point? Or could it be that physical fitness is a qualitative issue? Maybe a combination of both? What do you believe?

The only issue I can say about this is that (to me) physical fitness is much more than how many occasions you can lift a weight, how far you can run or if you are flexible adequate to place your feet behind your head or not. To me physical fitness is about factors that can’t generally be measured with numbers, it really is about much more than a quantity, a weight, a distance, a score.

www.diamondintheroughgym.com inform my consumers that we all have strengths and weaknesses at a variety of points in our lives. At 24 years of age I had 9% physique fat year-round, I could squat 700 pounds and bench press 405 pounds for reps. I can’t do that any longer. But I can do 35 pull-ups, stand on a stability ball for just about as extended as I want and touch my face to my knee when stretching, all issues I could not do as a beast-boy 24-year-old. So was I more match then or now?

Take a look at the people about you. What is their story? What are their experiences? Are they fat? Are they too skinny? Perhaps they’re really weak and can’t lift considerably weight. Perhaps they have a low-level of endurance and cannot run extremely far ahead of receiving winded. Consider about it for a moment then ask your self: if possibly their current level is much better than it was previously, does the fact that they do not reside up to your concept of what fitness need to be truly matter? If you believe about any of these points they all depend on a single thing: your perception of that particular person. I take the stance that fitness evolves as a individual passes through life. What you thought about fitness early in your life may perhaps not be the same concept you have about fitness later on. I encourage you to embrace fitness all through your life no matter what face it currently has.

Boost! Get far better in some way. You might not normally be in a position to do what you did as a young particular person but there are strategies exactly where you can grow to be even improved than you had been. And I’ve observed persons who had been quite sedentary as young folks who have steadily enhanced their physical fitness level as they’ve aged. 1 client of mine, Lisa, told me she’s (in her 60s) in the best shape of her adult life. Is not that what fitness is about? If you really feel about fitness, is not it about getting superior, improving and performing what you have to have to do to feel far better about your self and your physical physique? Are not these points mainly about excellent and not quantity?

I think so. I feel fitness has an infinite quantity of faces and requires on an limitless number of qualities. I encourage you to try not to see fitness in such a narrow scope that you forget that fitness, above all, is about people. It is about men and women obtaining superior, not being the best. Fitness is not a sport, it really is not a race and no 1 is maintaining score. Fitness is about you as an person. You may perhaps be a phenomenally profitable athlete like Lance Armstrong or Drew Brees (each fit men and women) or you may possibly be like my client Lisa (also a match person) who in her 60s decided she wanted to stroll with more power, feel much more steady and be in a position to play with her grandchildren.

Now I encourage you to think about this: Lisa can honestly say that she is in the ideal shape of her adult life, can Lance Armstrong at present say the exact same thing? So which person’s fitness level serves them ideal? I’ll let you choose.

Attempt to think of fitness as one thing that is inclusive, not exclusive. Sports are wonderful and in order to have a winner we have to retain score and evaluate one against the other. I encourage you to leave the score keeping to the athletes on the field-of-play, and only on the field-of-play, and not in the day-to-day activities that people today lead in their pursuit of fitness.